{
  "schema_version": "ecc.evaluator-rag.report.v1",
  "scenario_id": "skill-quality-evidence",
  "run_id": "2026-05-12-skill-quality-evidence-prototype",
  "result": "prototype_passed",
  "read_only": true,
  "scores": {
    "skill_contract_retrieval": 0.94,
    "observed_failure_evidence": 0.88,
    "example_quality": 0.9,
    "validation_specificity": 0.93,
    "publication_safety": 1
  },
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "examples-required",
      "severity": "warning",
      "summary": "Skill-quality changes need working examples or regression evidence; prose-only rewrites are not enough for promotion."
    },
    {
      "id": "observation-source-required",
      "severity": "warning",
      "summary": "Skill amendments should cite observed failure, user feedback, or a reference-set gap rather than broad style preference."
    },
    {
      "id": "publication-stays-blocked",
      "severity": "info",
      "summary": "The evaluator can recommend a maintainer PR, but it cannot update package, plugin, catalog, or publication state itself."
    }
  ],
  "recommended_next_action": {
    "candidate_id": "evidence-backed-skill-amendment",
    "action": "Use the promoted skill-quality playbook for PRs that add, rewrite, or amend skills, agents, commands, or rules guidance."
  }
}
