name: Quick product feedback
description: One required choice and an optional sentence. Leaving ECC is valid feedback.
title: "[Feedback] "
labels:
  - feedback
  - needs-triage
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Thank you for telling us what got in the way. This form is intentionally short.

        This is a public GitHub issue. Do not include secrets, prompts, customer data, or private repository details.

        Report a vulnerability through [GitHub's private security advisory form](https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/security/advisories/new), not here. Non-vulnerability security or trust concerns are welcome in this form.
  - type: dropdown
    id: reason
    attributes:
      label: What best describes your feedback?
      options:
        - I could not install or activate ECC
        - ECC made the agent slower or the output worse
        - ECC used too much token or context budget
        - Hooks or gates interrupted normal work
        - ECC was too complicated or required too much configuration
        - My harness or operating system was missing or unreliable
        - I had a security or trust concern
        - A feature I needed was missing
        - Support was too slow
        - I was only testing and no longer need it
        - Something worked especially well
        - Other
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: dropdown
    id: harness
    attributes:
      label: Where did you use ECC?
      options:
        - Claude Code
        - Codex
        - Cursor
        - OpenCode
        - GitHub Copilot
        - Another harness
        - I did not get far enough to use it
  - type: textarea
    id: change
    attributes:
      label: What is the one change that would matter most?
      description: Optional. One sentence is plenty.
  - type: textarea
    id: keep
    attributes:
      label: What should ECC keep?
      description: Optional. Tell us what was valuable even if the overall experience did not work.
