The real-PTY test piped answers on fixed sleeps, typing them ahead of
readline. Under CI load the first answer could land before the interface
listened, shifting every later answer onto the wrong question: the
ubuntu-latest Node 18.x npm job installed Claude only, exited 0, and never
printed the Kimi profile prompt while the sibling yarn, pnpm, and bun jobs
on the same Node version passed. Answer each prompt once it appears on
screen instead; spawned stdio goes through cat because the macOS script(1)
refuses a socket stdin.
The guided installer asks how ECC hooks should run, but that consent
lived only in the wizard path. Running install-apply directly with a
profile that includes hooks-runtime still materialized the hook runtime
with no disclosure and no decision.
Gate the apply layer instead, so every entry point is covered:
- disclose the six hook capability groups when a plan would materialize
the hook runtime, and refuse to apply until the caller decides
- --enable-hooks confirms the hook runtime; --no-hooks installs the rest
of the selection without it and records the reduced module closure in
install-state
- surface the pending decision as a dry-run warning
- show the same capability disclosure in the guided installer's plan
preview, so the wizard's hook question states what it is asking about
Plans that never materialize hooks (Kimi, --profile minimal,
--without baseline:hooks) are unaffected and need no flag. Repair and
uninstall operate on already-recorded state and stay unchanged.
The capability taxonomy and the held-materialization behavior come from
Samarjeet Singh Tomar's PR #2634, reworked to fit the single-decision
consent model that shipped with the guided installer in #2649.
Co-Authored-By: Samarjeet Singh Tomar <samar_tomar@hotmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Affaan Mustafa