* fix(skills): move version into metadata and normalize to semver 29 skills declared `version` at the top level of their frontmatter. The schema reads it from `metadata`, so tooling that follows the schema either misses it or has to special-case the top level. Three motion skills also declared `version: 1.0`, which is not a valid semantic version; normalized to `1.0.0`. No behavioral change — frontmatter metadata only. * fix(skills): state activation triggers in skill descriptions 148 skills described what they cover but never named the situation that should trigger them. Since the description is what Claude matches against to decide whether to load a skill, a description without a trigger makes activation guesswork — the skill is either missed or loaded at the wrong time. Added a "Use when ..." clause to each, derived from the skill's own body (most already stated the trigger under "## When to Use" or in the opening line; that intent is now reflected in the frontmatter where it is actually read from). Descriptions were only appended to; no existing wording was removed. * fix(skills): sync activation triggers into the Codex skill mirror 10 of the skills whose descriptions changed are also mirrored under `.agents/skills/`, where the description was previously a verbatim copy. Left alone, the two surfaces would disagree about when the skill applies. Only the description line is synced; the Codex copies keep their reduced frontmatter, since that validator accepts only name, description, metadata, license, and allowed-tools. * fix(skills): correct three activation clauses from review - autonomous-loops: the clause pulled new loop work into a skill that its own body marks as a compatibility shim retained for one release. It now points at the canonical continuous-agent-loop instead. - continuous-learning: the description carried the v1 routing directive twice; collapsed to one. - homelab-pihole-dns: the clause fired on any broken home DNS. Narrowed to tasks that actually involve Pi-hole. * chore: retain current main lockfile --------- Co-authored-by: Çağrı Solakoğlu <cagri.solakoglu@vtcenerji.com> Co-authored-by: haelyra <49814733+haelyra@users.noreply.github.com>
5.6 KiB
name, description, metadata
| name | description | metadata | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| healthcare-phi-compliance | Protected Health Information (PHI) and Personally Identifiable Information (PII) compliance patterns for healthcare applications. Covers data classification, access control, audit trails, encryption, and common leak vectors. Use when code touches PHI or PII in a healthcare system, or when auditing access control, audit trails, or leak vectors. |
|
Healthcare PHI/PII Compliance Patterns
Patterns for protecting patient data, clinician data, and financial data in healthcare applications. Applicable to HIPAA (US), DISHA (India), GDPR (EU), and general healthcare data protection.
When to Use
- Building any feature that touches patient records
- Implementing access control or authentication for clinical systems
- Designing database schemas for healthcare data
- Building APIs that return patient or clinician data
- Implementing audit trails or logging
- Reviewing code for data exposure vulnerabilities
- Setting up Row-Level Security (RLS) for multi-tenant healthcare systems
How It Works
Healthcare data protection operates on three layers: classification (what is sensitive), access control (who can see it), and audit (who did see it).
Data Classification
PHI (Protected Health Information) — any data that can identify a patient AND relates to their health: patient name, date of birth, address, phone, email, national ID numbers (SSN, Aadhaar, NHS number), medical record numbers, diagnoses, medications, lab results, imaging, insurance policy and claim details, appointment and admission records, or any combination of the above.
PII (Non-patient-sensitive data) in healthcare systems: clinician/staff personal details, doctor fee structures and payout amounts, employee salary and bank details, vendor payment information.
Access Control: Row-Level Security
ALTER TABLE patients ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
-- Scope access by facility
CREATE POLICY "staff_read_own_facility"
ON patients FOR SELECT TO authenticated
USING (facility_id IN (
SELECT facility_id FROM staff_assignments
WHERE user_id = auth.uid() AND role IN ('doctor','nurse','lab_tech','admin')
));
-- Audit log: insert-only (tamper-proof)
CREATE POLICY "audit_insert_only" ON audit_log FOR INSERT
TO authenticated WITH CHECK (user_id = auth.uid());
CREATE POLICY "audit_no_modify" ON audit_log FOR UPDATE USING (false);
CREATE POLICY "audit_no_delete" ON audit_log FOR DELETE USING (false);
Audit Trail
Every PHI access or modification must be logged:
interface AuditEntry {
timestamp: string;
user_id: string;
patient_id: string;
action: 'create' | 'read' | 'update' | 'delete' | 'print' | 'export';
resource_type: string;
resource_id: string;
changes?: { before: object; after: object };
ip_address: string;
session_id: string;
}
Common Leak Vectors
Error messages: Never include patient-identifying data in error messages thrown to the client. Log details server-side only.
Console output: Never log full patient objects. Use opaque internal record IDs (UUIDs) — not medical record numbers, national IDs, or names.
URL parameters: Never put patient-identifying data in query strings or path segments that could appear in logs or browser history. Use opaque UUIDs only.
Browser storage: Never store PHI in localStorage or sessionStorage. Keep PHI in memory only, fetch on demand.
Service role keys: Never use the service_role key in client-side code. Always use the anon/publishable key and let RLS enforce access.
Logs and monitoring: Never log full patient records. Use opaque record IDs only (not medical record numbers). Sanitize stack traces before sending to error tracking services.
Database Schema Tagging
Mark PHI/PII columns at the schema level:
COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.name IS 'PHI: patient_name';
COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.dob IS 'PHI: date_of_birth';
COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.aadhaar IS 'PHI: national_id';
COMMENT ON COLUMN doctor_payouts.amount IS 'PII: financial';
Deployment Checklist
Before every deployment:
- No PHI in error messages or stack traces
- No PHI in console.log/console.error
- No PHI in URL parameters
- No PHI in browser storage
- No service_role key in client code
- RLS enabled on all PHI/PII tables
- Audit trail for all data modifications
- Session timeout configured
- API authentication on all PHI endpoints
- Cross-facility data isolation verified
Examples
Example 1: Safe vs Unsafe Error Handling
// BAD — leaks PHI in error
throw new Error(`Patient ${patient.name} not found in ${patient.facility}`);
// GOOD — generic error, details logged server-side with opaque IDs only
logger.error('Patient lookup failed', { recordId: patient.id, facilityId });
throw new Error('Record not found');
Example 2: RLS Policy for Multi-Facility Isolation
-- Doctor at Facility A cannot see Facility B patients
CREATE POLICY "facility_isolation"
ON patients FOR SELECT TO authenticated
USING (facility_id IN (
SELECT facility_id FROM staff_assignments WHERE user_id = auth.uid()
));
-- Test: login as doctor-facility-a, query facility-b patients
-- Expected: 0 rows returned
Example 3: Safe Logging
// BAD — logs identifiable patient data
console.log('Processing patient:', patient);
// GOOD — logs only opaque internal record ID
console.log('Processing record:', patient.id);
// Note: even patient.id should be an opaque UUID, not a medical record number