mirror of
https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC.git
synced 2026-09-30 05:25:08 +02:00
labeedsoft-cloud
e58bb26647
`PROTECTED_FILES` matches exact basenames, so it only ever guarded a tool's
canonical entry point. Real repos split flat config across files — a shared
`eslint.config.base.mjs` holding the ignore list and rule severities, imported
by per-workspace `eslint.config.mjs` files, is the common monorepo shape.
That meant the hook protected the leaves and left the trunk wide open:
eslint.config.base.mjs <- ignore list + rule severities UNPROTECTED
frontend/eslint.config.mjs <- imports the base protected
backend/eslint.config.mjs <- imports the base protected
An agent blocked from touching the two leaves could silently rewrite every rule
severity in the file they both import. Hit in practice: two edits to
`eslint.config.js` were correctly blocked, then an edit to
`eslint.config.base.mjs` in the same repo went through unchallenged.
Adds `PROTECTED_PATTERNS` alongside the existing Set, covering
`<tool>.config.<qualifier>.<ext>` and `.<tool>rc.<qualifier>.<ext>` for the
linters and formatters already listed. Case-insensitive, for the same reason
the Set lookup is (#2543).
Deliberately NOT matched: `vite.config.ts`, `vitest.config.ts`,
`jest.config.js`, `playwright.config.ts`, `tsconfig.json`. This hook exists to
stop a LINTER config being weakened in place of fixing the code; editing a
bundler or test-runner config is ordinary work, and sweeping those in would
make the hook obstructive. A second test pins that boundary so a future
widening of the patterns cannot quietly cross it.
The exact-name Set is untouched, so nothing previously protected becomes
unprotected, and first-time creation stays allowed (the bootstrap path).
Tests: 11 pass. The new regression test was verified failing against the
unpatched hook first; the boundary test passes either way by design and is
there as the control.