From 298a19b5735a45549a1dd6c3e9972cc9aebfd290 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hamza Kyamanywa Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 06:56:33 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] docs: add missing word 'in' in the docs related to passing runtime args to tools (#3900) - Adds missing word 'in' - Sentence should read -> "The core technique **in** the examples below is" Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev --- docs/docs/how-tos/pass-run-time-values-to-tools.ipynb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/docs/how-tos/pass-run-time-values-to-tools.ipynb b/docs/docs/how-tos/pass-run-time-values-to-tools.ipynb index dca03b23e..dee49b953 100644 --- a/docs/docs/how-tos/pass-run-time-values-to-tools.ipynb +++ b/docs/docs/how-tos/pass-run-time-values-to-tools.ipynb @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ "

\n", " \n", "\n", - "The core technique the examples below is to **annotate** a parameter as \"injected\", meaning it will be injected by your program and should not be seen or populated by the LLM. Let the following codesnippet serve as a tl;dr:\n", + "The core technique in the examples below is to **annotate** a parameter as \"injected\", meaning it will be injected by your program and should not be seen or populated by the LLM. Let the following codesnippet serve as a tl;dr:\n", "\n", "```python\n", "from typing import Annotated\n",