From 32702dea0871555ff5f884715e2461c04a29c141 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:42:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] x

---
 docs/docs/concepts/human_in_the_loop.md | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/docs/concepts/human_in_the_loop.md b/docs/docs/concepts/human_in_the_loop.md
index 15413b3c8..2d5ffd7f9 100644
--- a/docs/docs/concepts/human_in_the_loop.md
+++ b/docs/docs/concepts/human_in_the_loop.md
@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ thread_config = {"configurable": {"thread_id": "some_id"}}
 graph.invoke(Command(resume=True), config=thread_config)
 ```
 
+See [how to review tool calls](../how-tos/human_in_the_loop/review-tool-calls.ipynb) for a more detailed example.
+
 ### Review & Edit State
 
 <figure markdown="1">
@@ -148,6 +150,8 @@ graph.invoke(
 )
 ```
 
+See [How to wait for user input using interrupt](../how-tos/human_in_the_loop/wait-user-input.ipynb) for a more detailed example.
+
 ### Review Tool Calls
 
 <figure markdown="1">
@@ -189,6 +193,8 @@ def human_review_node(state) -> Command[Literal["call_llm", "run_tool"]]:
         return Command(goto="call_llm", update={"messages": [feedback_msg]})
 ```
 
+See [how to review tool calls](../how-tos/human_in_the_loop/review-tool-calls.ipynb) for a more detailed example.
+
 ### Multi-turn conversation
 
 <figure markdown="1">
@@ -267,6 +273,8 @@ it may be part of a larger graph consisting of multiple nodes and include a cond
         )
     ```
 
+See [how to implement multi-turn conversations](../how-tos/multi-agent-multi-turn-convo.ipynb) for a more detailed example.
+
 ### Validating human input
 
 If you need to validate the input provided by the human within the graph itself (rather than on the client side), you can achieve this by using multiple interrupt calls within a single node.