From 4182538b0a191f4ab2a85cdb31804a88fe4ef00b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Mohamed A. Fouad" <111041768+moresearch@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 00:42:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update lats.ipynb (#227)

Fixes a typo.
---
 examples/lats/lats.ipynb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/examples/lats/lats.ipynb b/examples/lats/lats.ipynb
index 33dcd3a35..039e5c2ae 100644
--- a/examples/lats/lats.ipynb
+++ b/examples/lats/lats.ipynb
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@
    "source": [
     "## Conclusion\n",
     "\n",
-    "Congrats on implementing LATS! This is a technique that can be reasonably ast and effective at solving complex reasoning tasks. A few notes that you probably observed above:\n",
+    "Congrats on implementing LATS! This is a technique that can be reasonably fast and effective at solving complex reasoning tasks. A few notes that you probably observed above:\n",
     "1. While effective , the tree rollout can take additional compute time. If you wanted to include this in a production app, you'd either want to ensure that intermediate steps are streamed (so the user sees the thinking process/has access to intermediate results) or use it for fine-tuning data to improve the single-shot accuracy and avoid long rollouts.\n",
     "2. The candidate selection process is only as good as the reward you generate. Here we are using self-reflection exclusively, but if you have an external source of feedback (such as code test execution), that should be incorporated in the locations mentioned above."
    ]