From 909cb3e3ad9fc92133a33a59a5000bfdcb929901 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: William Fu-Hinthorn <13333726+hinthornw@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:19:47 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Reflection readme

---
 README.md | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index dd3a2f28a..e5f7f2164 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ The following notebooks implement agent architectures prototypical of the "plan-
 
 When output quality is a major concern, it's common to incorporate some combination of self-critique or reflection and external validation to refine your system's outputs. The following examples demonstrate research that implement this type of design.
 
+- [Basic Reflection](./examples/reflection/reflection.ipynb): add a simple "reflect" step in your graph to prompt your system to revise its outputs.
 - [Reflexion](./examples/reflexion/reflexion.ipynb): critique missing and superflous aspects of the agent's response to guide subsequent steps. Based on [Reflexion](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11366), by Shinn, et. al.
 - [Language Agent Tree Search](./examples/lats/lats.ipynb): execute multiple agents in parallel, using reflection and environmental rewards to drive a Monte Carlo Tree Search. Based on [LATS](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04406/LanguageAgentTreeSearch/), by Zhou, et. al.