From ab80c113ac5b673f56ceba6c6bf6a35ae85ce20c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: trevor-cyi <142810014+trevor-cyi@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:27:42 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] docs: Use bound model in convo history (#1082)

This fixes a small mistake in the manage-conversation-history notebook
where the model bound with tools was not used, instead, the original model
was used when invocations occur.
---
 examples/memory/manage-conversation-history.ipynb | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/examples/memory/manage-conversation-history.ipynb b/examples/memory/manage-conversation-history.ipynb
index 94da14225..2cdeb85d0 100644
--- a/examples/memory/manage-conversation-history.ipynb
+++ b/examples/memory/manage-conversation-history.ipynb
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
     "\n",
     "# Define the function that calls the model\n",
     "def call_model(state: MessagesState):\n",
-    "    response = model.invoke(state[\"messages\"])\n",
+    "    response = bound_model.invoke(state[\"messages\"])\n",
     "    # We return a list, because this will get added to the existing list\n",
     "    return {\"messages\": response}\n",
     "\n",
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@
     "# Define the function that calls the model\n",
     "def call_model(state: MessagesState):\n",
     "    messages = filter_messages(state[\"messages\"])\n",
-    "    response = model.invoke(messages)\n",
+    "    response = bound_model.invoke(messages)\n",
     "    # We return a list, because this will get added to the existing list\n",
     "    return {\"messages\": response}\n",
     "\n",