This PR does a few things:
1. Surfaces interrupts when `stream_mode='values'` (particularly
relevant for `invoke`, where this is the default behavior)
2. Adds an `interrupt_id` property to the `Interrupt` dataclass so that
interrupts can effectively be mapped to resumes
3. Minor docs updates to reflect the new pattern (no need for a special
section on interrupts with `invoke` and `ainvoke`)
* In a different PR (the one with the multiple resume values), as it's
more relevant there: add an `interrupts` property to `StateSnapshot` so
that `interrupts` can easily be iterated over if users are attempting to
map interrupts to resumes.
I **don't** recommend we release this until we have multi-resumes
working.
## Example
We have the following setup where we're sending multiple prompts to the
child graph, which uses `interrupt`:
```py
def child_graph(state):
human_input = interrupt(state["prompt"])
return {
"human_inputs": [human_input],
}
```
<img width="142" alt="Screenshot 2025-04-23 at 10 01 12 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c6238bf1-54ad-4e48-ab0b-60a0bfc18485"
/>
Old behavior:
```py
initial_input = {"prompts": ["a", "b"]}
print(parent_graph.invoke(input=initial_input,config=thread_config,stream_mode="values"))
#> {'prompts': ['a', 'b'], 'human_inputs': []}
print(parent_graph.invoke(Command(resume="hello 1"),config=thread_config,stream_mode="values"))
#> {'prompts': ['a', 'b'], 'human_inputs': ['hello 1']}
print(parent_graph.invoke(Command(resume="hello 2"),config=thread_config,stream_mode="values"))
#> {'prompts': ['a', 'b'], 'human_inputs': ['hello 1', 'hello 2']}
```
New behavior:
```py
initial_input = {"prompts": ["a", "b"]}
print(parent_graph.invoke(input=initial_input,config=thread_config,stream_mode="values"))
"""
{
"prompts": ["a", "b"],
"human_inputs": [],
"__interrupt__": [
Interrupt(
value="a",
resumable=True,
ns=["child_graph:38d43a18-a5e7-8ab2-ca83-9d80f6e9ca83"]
),
Interrupt(
value="b",
resumable=True,
ns=["child_graph:dad810e8-738e-9f90-41cd-30c0091eb79b"]
)
]
}
"""
print(parent_graph.invoke(Command(resume="hello 1"),config=thread_config,stream_mode="values"))
"""
{
"prompts": ["a", "b"],
"human_inputs": ["hello 1"],
"__interrupt__": [
Interrupt(
value="b",
resumable=True,
ns=["child_graph:dad810e8-738e-9f90-41cd-30c0091eb79b"]
)
]
}
"""
print(parent_graph.invoke(Command(resume="hello 2"),config=thread_config,stream_mode="values"))
#> {'prompts': ['a', 'b'], 'human_inputs': ['hello 1', 'hello 2']}
```
Using this argument, you can get more customization since you can do
`langgraph build` or directly `docker build` your image and then re-use
the `langgraph up --image my-image` and have it also spin up redis &
postgres for you.
Easier then writing your own compose file
- It now executes the same pregel algo as when the graph is executed (without running any user code in nodes or conditional edges) to discover all the edges
- This means we now support drawing the graph for all Pregel instances, not just StateGraph
If the state schema uses validators, skip the model construct
optimization.
For context, pydantic state can be significantly slower to run than
typed dict and dataclass states due to the full recursive validation.
We have some optimizations to reduce the impact of this (using cached
validators with model_construct), but this doesn't handle things like
field_validator.
We prefer correctness over performance, obviously.
Resolves: https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/issues/4074
Signed-off-by: William Fu-Hinthorn <13333726+hinthornw@users.noreply.github.com>
The configuration expects the key "fields", not "text_fields": I had
failed to update across all implementations in the original PR
Thank you to Vincent Min for the fix!
---------
Co-authored-by: Vincent Min <93780551+VMinB12@users.noreply.github.com>
Nuno Campos