**Description:** Bumping the checkpoint-postgres package to version
3.0.1 to release an update to migrations
(https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/6400).
**Issue:** N/A
**Dependencies:** N/A
**Twitter handle:** N/A
namespace decisions
```
langgraph.prebuilt
├── ToolRuntime # new
# all of the other stuff that was already there
langgraph.prebuilt.tool_node
├── ToolNode
├── ToolCallRequest # new
├── ToolRuntime # new
├── InjectedState
├── InjectedStore
├── ToolCallWrapper
├── AsyncToolCallWrapper
├── tools_condition
```
```
langchain.tools
├── ToolRuntime # now from langgraph.prebuilt
├── InjectedState # now from langgraph.prebuilt
├── InjectedStore # now from langgraph.prebuilt
├── ToolException
├── tool
├── BaseTool
├── InjectedToolArg
├── InjectedToolCallId
```
bumping core dependency for `langgraph-prebuilt` to `>1.0.0` so that we
can take advantage of internal utils that allow `ToolRuntime` injection.
We were previously bumping the version in lock step with prebuilt (prev
version was 0.3.67), so this pattern is in line with that.
Also updating snapshots accordingly:
* New mermaid syntax for a few graphs
* Removal of `examples` from `AIMessage`
In this PR:
- Bump `langgraph-checkpoint` to 3.0
- Bump `langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite` to 3.0; Update
`langgraph-checkpoint` deps to >=3,<4
- Bump `langgraph-checkpoint-postgres` to 3.0; Update
`langgraph-checkpoint` max to <4 (keep prior min since the deprecated
functionality wasn't explicitly used)
- Bump `langgraph` to 1.0.1; update `langgraph-checkpoint` max bound to
4
- Bump `prebuilt` to 1.0.1; update `langgraph-checkpoint` max bound to 4
* catching error thrown by asyncio
* using 2nd check for annotations given Pydantic 2.12 changes
* skipping tests for remote graph bc langgraph-api is dependent on
`jsonschema-rs`
* skipping tests w/ pydantic v1 models
```bash
hint: This usually indicates a problem with the package or the build environment.
help: `jsonschema-rs` (v0.29.1) was included because `langgraph:dev` (v1.0.0rc1) depends on `langgraph-cli[inmem]` which
depends on `langgraph-api` (v0.4.29) which depends on `jsonschema-rs`
```
not yet testing for free threaded python, that'll be much more involved!
ended up separating lint / testing deps during this process bc I was
getting a ton of not required deps while testing that were complicating
things :/
This PR updates the dependencies in all Python packages using `uv lock
--upgrade`.
This is an automated PR created by the UV Lock Upgrade workflow.
Co-authored-by: sydney-runkle <54324534+sydney-runkle@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR updates the dependencies in all Python packages using `uv lock
--upgrade`.
This is an automated PR created by the UV Lock Upgrade workflow.
Co-authored-by: sydney-runkle <54324534+sydney-runkle@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR updates the dependencies in all Python packages using `uv lock
--upgrade`.
This is an automated PR created by the UV Lock Upgrade workflow.
To make tests pass:
* linting fixes
* whitespace fixes in snapshots
---------
Co-authored-by: sydney-runkle <54324534+sydney-runkle@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sydney Runkle <sydneymarierunkle@gmail.com>
### Description
Adds Redis as a supported cache backend for LangGraph node-level
caching, enabling distributed caching across multiple processes/servers.
This implementation follows the same patterns as existing InMemoryCache
and SqliteCache.
### Key changes
- New RedisCache class implementing the BaseCache interface
- Support for TTL-based expiration and batch operations
- Worker-specific cache prefixes for parallel test isolation
### Dependencies
- redis package (already included in dev dependencies)
### Test Plan
- Unit tests: Added Redis cache tests covering basic operations, TTL,
batch operations, and error handling
- Integration tests: Redis cache integrated into existing LangGraph test
suite, tested with all checkpointer combinations
Reproduces:
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/issues/5249#issuecomment-3156519635
Caused after this change:
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/4843
Fix to allow emitting messages from subgraphs if the subgraphs
explicitly used a stream mode "messages".
```python
def node_in_parent(...):
# subgraph was called as a function.
# messages are explicitly requested.
for event in subgraph.stream(..., stream_mode="messages"):
# something is done with `event`
return ...
# subgraphs = False!
parent_graph.invoke(..., subgraphs=False)
```
The code above should continue to work correctly regardless of the value
of subgraphs as streaming messages was requested explicitly in the
parent node!
---------
Co-authored-by: Sydney Runkle <54324534+sydney-runkle@users.noreply.github.com>
`MessageGraph` is deprecated, to be removed in v2.
A `StateGraph` with a `messages` key should be used instead.
Alternatively, folks can use `Annotated[list[AnyMessage], add_messages]` as their state schema.
Reverts https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/5562
I anticipate that we want to do another pass at a refactor here in the
short term, but this makes it easier to adapt to new langchain core
message types for v0.4 support in the short term.
Fixes https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/issues/5784
* Removes usage of `is_last_step`, no longer needed with
`remaining_steps`
* Make `remaining_steps` `NotRequired` so that json schema doesn't
suggest need for user input
* Move `PregelScratchpad` to shared utils file to prevent circular
import issue (it's used from `channels/managed` and other pregel files).
* Ensures that managed values wrapped in `NotRequired` or `Required` are
still recognized!
- **Description:** Update the type annotations in create_react_agent to
allow one to provide a callable for the model that uses bind_tools and
returns a Runnable[LanguageModelInput, BaseMessage]
- **Issue:** #5739
---------
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
## Description
Previously, when a tool returned `Command` to update the graph's state,
the `_validate_tool_command` method in `ToolNode` would raise a
`ValueError` if the `messages_update` list contained only a
`RemoveMessage(id=REMOVE_ALL_MESSAGES)` object. This was because the
validation logic expected a matching `ToolMessage` for the tool call and
did not account for this specific state-clearing scenario.
This commit modifies the validation logic to check if the
`messages_update` list contains a single
`RemoveMessage(id=REMOVE_ALL_MESSAGES)` element. If this condition is
met, the `ToolMessage` validation is bypassed, allowing a tool to clear
the entire message history without causing a validation error.
A new test case, `test_tool_node_command_remove_all_messages`, has been
added to `tests/test_tool_node.py` to verify this change and prevent
future regressions.
## Example
Here is a self-contained example that illustrates the problem and the
fix. Without this change, the code block for `Example 2` would raise a
`ValueError`.
```python
from typing import Annotated, List
from langchain_core.messages import (
AIMessage,
AnyMessage,
HumanMessage,
RemoveMessage,
ToolMessage,
)
from langchain_core.tools import InjectedToolCallId, tool
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
from langgraph.graph import END, StateGraph, add_messages
from langgraph.graph.message import REMOVE_ALL_MESSAGES
from langgraph.prebuilt import InjectedState, ToolNode
from langgraph.types import Command
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
# Agent state tracks current and all messages
class AgentState(BaseModel):
messages: Annotated[List[AnyMessage], add_messages] = Field(
default_factory=list, description="Current conversation messages."
)
all_messages: Annotated[List[AnyMessage], add_messages] = Field(
default_factory=list, description="All messages, including removed ones."
)
# Tool to clear history if long enough, otherwise returns a warning
@tool
def clear_history_tool(
state: Annotated[AgentState, InjectedState],
tool_call_id: Annotated[str, InjectedToolCallId],
):
"""Clears message history if it's long enough."""
if len(state.messages) < 3:
return Command(
update={
"messages": [
ToolMessage(
"History is not long enough to be cleared. Please try again.",
tool_call_id=tool_call_id,
)
]
}
)
else:
return Command(
update={
"messages": [RemoveMessage(id=REMOVE_ALL_MESSAGES)],
"all_messages": state.messages
+ [
ToolMessage(
"History has been successfully cleared.",
tool_call_id=tool_call_id,
)
],
}
)
# Bind the tool to the model
model = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o-mini").bind_tools([clear_history_tool])
def model_node(state: AgentState):
return {"messages": [model.invoke(state.messages)]}
# Build the agent graph
graph_builder = StateGraph(AgentState)
graph_builder.add_node("model", model_node)
graph_builder.add_node("tools", ToolNode([clear_history_tool]))
graph_builder.set_entry_point("model")
graph_builder.add_edge("model", "tools")
graph_builder.add_edge("tools", END)
graph = graph_builder.compile()
def print_messages(header, messages):
print(f"\n{header}")
for message in messages:
message.pretty_print()
### Example 1: Not enough history to clear
state_1 = AgentState(
messages=[HumanMessage(content="Please clear my message history.")]
)
output_1 = graph.invoke(state_1)
print_messages("First call: State 'messages'", output_1["messages"])
print_messages("First call: State 'all_messages'", output_1["all_messages"])
### Example 2: History is cleared
state_2 = AgentState(
messages=[
HumanMessage(content="Will this PR get merged?"),
AIMessage(content="Maybe, if it's good enough."),
HumanMessage(content="Please clear my message history."),
]
)
# Without the changes in this PR, the following line will raise a ValueError
output_2 = graph.invoke(state_2)
print_messages("Second call: State 'messages'", output_2["messages"])
print_messages("Second call: State 'all_messages'", output_2["all_messages"])
```
### Outputs
*Without the changes in this PR:*
```
First call: State 'messages'
================================ Human Message =================================
Please clear my message history.
================================== Ai Message ==================================
Tool Calls:
clear_history_tool (ba421ac3-1e1a-4208-a8f6-c5500ee0abcc)
Call ID: ba421ac3-1e1a-4208-a8f6-c5500ee0abcc
Args:
================================= Tool Message =================================
Name: clear_history_tool
History is not long enough to be cleared. Please try again.
First call: State 'all_messages'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "main.py", line 114, in <module>
output_2 = graph.invoke(state_2)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File ".venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/langgraph/pregel/__init__.py", line 2844, in invoke
for chunk in self.stream(
File ".venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/langgraph/pregel/__init__.py", line 2534, in stream
for _ in runner.tick(
File ".venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/langgraph/prebuilt/tool_node.py", line 241, in _func
outputs = [
^
File ".venv/lib/python3.11/concurrent/futures/_base.py", line 619, in result_iterator
yield _result_or_cancel(fs.pop())
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File ".venv/lib/python3.11/concurrent/futures/_base.py", line 317, in _result_or_cancel
return fut.result(timeout)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File ".venv/lib/python3.11/concurrent/futures/_base.py", line 449, in result
return self.__get_result()
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File ".venv/lib/python3.11/concurrent/futures/_base.py", line 401, in __get_result
raise self._exception
File ".venv/lib/python3.11/concurrent/futures/thread.py", line 58, in run
result = self.fn(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File ".venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/langchain_core/runnables/config.py", line 555, in _wrapped_fn
return contexts.pop().run(fn, *args)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File ".venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/langgraph/prebuilt/tool_node.py", line 353, in _run_one
return self._validate_tool_command(response, call, input_type)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File ".venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/langgraph/prebuilt/tool_node.py", line 616, in _validate_tool_command
raise ValueError(
ValueError: Expected to have a matching ToolMessage in Command.update for tool 'clear_history_tool', got: [RemoveMessage(content='', additional_kwargs={}, response_metadata={}, id='__remove_all__')]. Every tool call (LLM requesting to call a tool) in the message history MUST have a corresponding ToolMessage. You can fix it by modifying the tool to return `Command(update={"messages": [ToolMessage("Success", tool_call_id=tool_call_id), ...]}, ...)`.
```
*With the changes in this PR:*
```
First call: State 'messages'
================================ Human Message =================================
Please clear my message history.
================================== Ai Message ==================================
Tool Calls:
clear_history_tool (ba421ac3-1e1a-4208-a8f6-c5500ee0abcc)
Call ID: ba421ac3-1e1a-4208-a8f6-c5500ee0abcc
Args:
================================= Tool Message =================================
Name: clear_history_tool
History is not long enough to be cleared. Please try again.
First call: State 'all_messages'
Second call: State 'messages'
Second call: State 'all_messages'
================================ Human Message =================================
Will this PR get merged?
================================== Ai Message ==================================
Maybe, if it's good enough.
================================ Human Message =================================
Please clear my message history.
================================== Ai Message ==================================
Tool Calls:
clear_history_tool (499b1be3-6df1-493f-85e5-8d7e429dead8)
Call ID: 499b1be3-6df1-493f-85e5-8d7e429dead8
Args:
================================= Tool Message =================================
Name: clear_history_tool
History has been successfully cleared.
```
## Twitter handle
[@samuelpullely](https://x.com/samuelpullely)
---------
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
Sydney Runkle