- Leave it up to each checkpointer implementation to decide whether to merge in configurable/metadata (previously PregelLoop would do some of this always)
- Never copy over internal langgraph keys into checkpoint.metadata (these are redundant/misleading to include)
Prepare langgraph-checkpoint for 0.5
- Given we have no upper bound on langgraph-checkpoint dep need to undo all changes in langgraph-checkpoint that might break previous versions of langgraph
- This has been superseded by saving the individual writes of each task through put_writes()
- Removing this speeds up checkpoint operations as it was duplicating data saved elsewhere already
- Instead store sends in a Topic channel, removing the need to fetch sends as writes against the parent checkpoint
- Remove deprecated/unused functions in langgraph-checkpoint (will require bumping min range for langgraph-checkpoint in langgraph lib)
- Implement migration of old pending sends in langgraph-checkpoint-postgres
- Ensure parent config of `checkpoint_during=False` checkpoints always points to checkpoints that were also saved
* Migrate to `uv`
* Format `pyproject.toml` files properly
* Remove upper bounds on dependencies, and bounds on dev dependencies
(we should be using latest)
* Move to hatch for packaing
In the future we should:
* Set up dependabot / automate lockfile updates and tests
* Add tests for min compatible versions (I'll do this right after merge)
* Use dynamic versioning
* Bump `pydantic` to v2.11.4 in the lockfile, we have some tests failing
A few notes:
* We shouldn't be using `tool.poetry.dependencies`, that's deprecated -
waiting for a future PR to address this big change though.
* We should remove upper bounds for all deps unless strictly necessary.
- Deletes all data associated with a thread_id
- Implemented in InMemory, Sqlite and Postgres checkpointers
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
If you're deploying with langgraph API, you don't need to manually
define a checkpointer. For folks who already know they'll be developing
with the api server, I'd like to save everyone time by making this more
clear in the docs on checkpointing.
- This mirrors the work done earlier on BaseChannel.get()
- Comparing to a sentinel value is significantly faster than raising and catching an exception
