mirror of
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph.git
synced 2026-08-17 21:25:46 +02:00
15 KiB
15 KiB
In [1]:
%%capture --no-stderr
%pip install -U langgraph langchain langchain_openai langchain_experimental langsmith pandasIn [1]:
import getpass
import os
def _set_if_undefined(var: str):
if not os.environ.get(var):
os.environ[var] = getpass.getpass(f"Please provide your {var}")
_set_if_undefined("OPENAI_API_KEY")
_set_if_undefined("TAVILY_API_KEY")In [1]:
from typing import Annotated
from langchain_community.tools.tavily_search import TavilySearchResults
from langchain_experimental.tools import PythonREPLTool
tavily_tool = TavilySearchResults(max_results=5)
# This executes code locally, which can be unsafe
python_repl_tool = PythonREPLTool()In [2]:
from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage
def agent_node(state, agent, name):
result = agent.invoke(state)
return {"messages": [HumanMessage(content=result["messages"][-1].content, name=name)]}In [13]:
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate, MessagesPlaceholder
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import Literal
members = ["Researcher", "Coder"]
system_prompt = (
"You are a supervisor tasked with managing a conversation between the"
" following workers: {members}. Given the following user request,"
" respond with the worker to act next. Each worker will perform a"
" task and respond with their results and status. When finished,"
" respond with FINISH."
)
# Our team supervisor is an LLM node. It just picks the next agent to process
# and decides when the work is completed
options = ["FINISH"] + members
class routeResponse(BaseModel):
next: Literal[*options]
prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_messages(
[
("system", system_prompt),
MessagesPlaceholder(variable_name="messages"),
(
"system",
"Given the conversation above, who should act next?"
" Or should we FINISH? Select one of: {options}",
),
]
).partial(options=str(options), members=", ".join(members))
llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o")
def supervisor_agent(state):
supervisor_chain = (
prompt
| llm.with_structured_output(routeResponse)
)
return supervisor_chain.invoke(state)In [14]:
import functools
import operator
from typing import Sequence, TypedDict
from langchain_core.messages import BaseMessage
from langgraph.graph import END, StateGraph, START
from langgraph.prebuilt import create_react_agent
# The agent state is the input to each node in the graph
class AgentState(TypedDict):
# The annotation tells the graph that new messages will always
# be added to the current states
messages: Annotated[Sequence[BaseMessage], operator.add]
# The 'next' field indicates where to route to next
next: str
research_agent = create_react_agent(llm, tools=[tavily_tool])
research_node = functools.partial(agent_node, agent=research_agent, name="Researcher")
# NOTE: THIS PERFORMS ARBITRARY CODE EXECUTION. PROCEED WITH CAUTION
code_agent = create_react_agent(llm, tools=[python_repl_tool])
code_node = functools.partial(agent_node, agent=code_agent, name="Coder")
workflow = StateGraph(AgentState)
workflow.add_node("Researcher", research_node)
workflow.add_node("Coder", code_node)
workflow.add_node("supervisor", supervisor_agent)In [15]:
for member in members:
# We want our workers to ALWAYS "report back" to the supervisor when done
workflow.add_edge(member, "supervisor")
# The supervisor populates the "next" field in the graph state
# which routes to a node or finishes
conditional_map = {k: k for k in members}
conditional_map["FINISH"] = END
workflow.add_conditional_edges("supervisor", lambda x: x["next"], conditional_map)
# Finally, add entrypoint
workflow.add_edge(START, "supervisor")
graph = workflow.compile()In [16]:
for s in graph.stream(
{
"messages": [
HumanMessage(content="Code hello world and print it to the terminal")
]
}
):
if "__end__" not in s:
print(s)
print("----"){'supervisor': {'next': 'Coder'}}
----
{'Coder': {'messages': [HumanMessage(content='The code to print "Hello, World!" to the terminal is:\n\n```python\nprint(\'Hello, World!\')\n```\n\nWhen executed, it prints:\n```\nHello, World!\n```', name='Coder')]}}
----
{'supervisor': {'next': 'FINISH'}}
----
In [7]:
for s in graph.stream(
{"messages": [HumanMessage(content="Write a brief research report on pikas.")]},
{"recursion_limit": 100},
):
if "__end__" not in s:
print(s)
print("----"){'supervisor': {'next': 'Researcher'}}
----
{'Researcher': {'messages': [HumanMessage(content='# Research Report on Pikas\n\nPikas, belonging to the genus Ochotona, are small, short-legged, and virtually tailless mammals that are often found in the mountains of western North America and across much of Asia. Despite their rodent-like appearance, pikas are not rodents but rather are part of the order Lagomorpha, which also includes rabbits and hares.\n\n## Behavior and Ecology\nPikas are known for their unique behavior of not hibernating and remaining active throughout the winter. They navigate through tunnels under rocks and snow and rely on dried plants, which they have stored during warmer months in caches known as "haypiles." This foraging strategy, termed "haying," is crucial for their survival during the harsh winter months.\n\nPikas have a preference for cooler temperatures, typically foraging in temperatures below 25°C (77°F). They tend to avoid direct sunlight and stay in shaded regions when it gets warmer. A study has shown that for every 1°C (1.8°F) increase in ambient temperature, pikas can lose 3% of their foraging time, making them sensitive to climate change.\n\n## Distribution and Habitat\nThe American pika (Ochotona princeps) and its relative, the collared pika (O. collaris), are found throughout the high mountainous regions of western North America. These species prefer cooler climates and have been observed to retreat to higher elevations as a response to increasing temperatures. Their current distribution is believed to be a result of a retreat from much larger ranges they occupied in the past, which included Western Europe and Eastern North America.\n\n## Conservation Status\nThe International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) lists the American pika as a species of Least Concern but notes that populations are declining and unlikely to rebound due to habitat loss from extreme temperatures. The sensitivity of pikas to summer heat makes them an indicator species for the potential effects of climate change. Studies have shown that some populations are in decline, and there have been cases of local extirpation, particularly in the Great Basin.\n\n## Human Impact\nHuman activity has impacted the ecosystems where pikas live, with recorded interactions dating back to the 1970s. Such interactions have been linked to pikas having reduced foraging time, limiting the amount of food they can stockpile for winter. Additionally, pikas have been considered pests in regions like the Tibetan plateau, where high densities of burrowing pikas are thought to reduce forage for domestic livestock and damage grasslands.\n\n## Conclusion\nPikas are fascinating creatures with distinct adaptations that allow them to thrive in alpine environments. However, their future is uncertain due to the looming threats of climate change and habitat alteration. Conservation efforts, research, and monitoring are vital to ensure the survival of these unique mammals in a changing world.\n\n---\n\n**Sources:**\n- [Wikipedia - Pika](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pika)\n- [Treehugger - American Pika](https://www.treehugger.com/surprising-facts-about-american-pika-4864528)\n- [National Park Service - Pikas at Rocky Mountain National Park](https://www.nps.gov/romo/learn/nature/pikas.htm)\n- [Wikipedia - American Pika](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_pika)\n- [Britannica - Pika](https://www.britannica.com/animal/pika)', name='Researcher')]}}
----
{'supervisor': {'next': 'FINISH'}}
----
