Files
openswarm/docs/perf/winv2
Eric 24a767eec9 [eric] perf: winv2 windows startup + app builder profiling, tracking doc, graphs
- warm boot floor 8256ms -> 857ms; app builder download + create breakdown measured

- harnesses, csv, dependency-free svg graphs, per-step savings table, #9 plan
2026-06-16 21:58:39 -07:00
..

winv2: Windows startup + App Builder speed and bug fixes

Branch: eric/winv2. Goal: profile the real Windows experience first, find the biggest bottleneck before changing anything, then fix the two reported bugs and make startup + first-app download feel instant. All numbers below are measured on the real installed packaged app (Squirrel install at AppData/Local/openswarm, latest app-1.2.82), Windows 11, not dev mode.

Notion tracking (Todos DB):

  • [Perf] Windows startup + download speed: backend cold-start is the bottleneck
  • [App Builder] Windows preview broken: no bundled bash/npm + missing node_modules archive
  • [Bug] Skills list empty until reboots + onboarding "Install a skill" step times out
  • [Reliability] Distributed-systems hardening (design)

How these numbers were measured

Source of truth: the packaged app's own perf markers in AppData/Roaming/openswarm/data/backend.log ([perf] app-launch, [perf] first-paint, [perf] backend-http-ready, written by electron/main.js). These are wall-clock ms from process start, i.e. exactly what the user feels. Raw extract: baseline_startup.csv. Re-run with profile_startup.sh.

Import cost measured with the bundled interpreter: python-env/python.exe -X importtime -c "import backend.main".

Baseline (BEFORE any change)

Startup, per launch (ms)

metric warm (typical) cold (first run after each update)
app-launch (electron ready) 107-400 107-563
first-paint (renderer) 338-1205 ~1200
backend-http-ready 8700-10500 54600 / 81000 / 86300 / 133000 / 138300

Electron shell paints in well under 1.5s every time. The Python backend is the whole story: ~9-10s warm, and 54-138 seconds on a cold/post-update launch. First-agent-response figures in the log are dominated by user think-time and are not treated as a startup metric.

Why the backend is slow (evidence)

factor measurement effect
python-env file count 13,554 files (4,510 .py/.pyd/.dll), 484 MB Windows Defender real-time scan of every file on the first run after each update = the 1-2 minute cold spikes
app.asar size 639 MB cold disk read on first launch
backend.main import tree ~2.2 s warm (-X importtime) floor on warm boot, before interpreter init + lifespans
debugger project scan runs at import (DEBUGLETON / build_structure) extra warm boot time on the critical path
SubApp lifespans entered sequentially in config/Apps.py before HTTP bind serialized startup I/O

Bottleneck ranking (before changes)

  1. Python backend cold-start (dominant). 9-10s warm, 54-138s cold. ~95% of perceived startup. Cold case driven by Defender scanning 13.5k files + the 639 MB asar; warm case by import tree + debugger scan + serial lifespans.
  2. App Builder first-app on Windows is fully broken (Bug #2): no bundled bash, bundled node has no npm, and the Windows build ships no node_modules archive. Confirmed against the installed binary. Until fixed, "download time" for an app is effectively infinite (it never succeeds on a clean machine).
  3. Skills registry network race (Bug #1): empty catalog until reboot, breaks the onboarding "Install a skill" step (15s selector timeout).

Plan (status tracked here + on Notion)

  • [~] Bug #2 App Builder: junction/copy link fallback DONE + tested; archive in Windows build + direct vite spawn (no bash) TODO
  • [~] Bug #1 Skills: bundled snapshot + disk cache + retry-until-success DONE + tested (catalog never empty offline, onboarding pdf selector resolves); frontend loading-vs-empty retry TODO
  • Perf: trim Defender surface, lazy imports, non-blocking lifespans, move debugger scan off boot, App Builder warm pool
  • Re-measure, before/after tables + graphs

Progress log

  • 2026-06-16 baseline measured (this doc), graphs generated, Notion todos opened.
  • 2026-06-16 Bug #1 backend: skill_registry.py now seeds from bundled skills_snapshot.json + on-disk last-good cache and retries until first success. Proven non-empty fully offline (17 skills, search+stats green); pdf skill present so onboarding skill-item-pdf resolves. Regression test backend/tests/test_skill_registry_seed.py (3 cases green).
  • 2026-06-16 Bug #2 link: _link_node_modules now falls back symlink -> junction (mklink /J, no admin) -> copy, so node_modules links even on a locked-down Windows box. Tested with forced symlink failure.

Results (AFTER)

The warm-startup bottleneck was found and fixed

Per-SubApp-lifespan profiling (profile_boot.py) showed the entire ~8s gap was one lifespan:

boot phase before after note
import backend.main 798 ms 764 ms unchanged (debugger scan is only ~80 ms)
service lifespan 7412 ms 84 ms was await ensure_9router() blocking the HTTP bind
other 15 lifespans 45 ms 9 ms all trivial
import + lifespans floor 8256 ms 857 ms ~7.4 s removed (~90%)

Fix: service.py now starts 9Router in the background instead of awaiting it on the boot path. 9Router is only needed when the user sends an agent message, and the dispatch path already calls ensure_running() (now lock-serialized in process.py so the background start and a dispatch-time ensure can't double-spawn). Net: warm backend-http-ready should drop from ~9-10 s to ~2-3 s, comfortably under the 10 s goal. See boot_breakdown.svg.

Still open (cold start)

The 54-138 s cold spikes are Windows Defender scanning the 13,554-file / 484 MB python-env on the first run after each update, plus cold-reading the 639 MB asar. That is a packaging change (fewer/larger files, trusted-location, or zipped stdlib) and is higher-risk, tracked separately. The 9Router backgrounding also helps cold (it no longer compounds the Defender wait).

App Builder first-app "download" + create path (measured)

Per-phase, measured on this Windows box (measure_appbuilder.py + measure_vite.py), isolated temp dirs, real warm caches. See appbuilder_breakdown.svg.

phase time when it's paid
seed workspace + link node_modules 67 ms every app (instant; junction/symlink to warm cache)
download: archive extract (new build path) 14.2 s once per machine/template version (Defender-bound: 215 MB nm)
download: npm install (cold fallback) 42.7 s once, only if no archive ships
vite bind: cold vite cache 6.7 s first app ever (esbuild pre-bundle)
vite bind: warm shared cache 0.7 s every subsequent app
build-time: tar nm -> archive 6.8 s on CI, never on the user's machine

User-facing scenarios (create app -> live preview):

scenario total notes
first app, clean Windows, BEFORE fix never works [WinError 2] / "backend exited with code 1" (no bash/npm/archive)
first app, AFTER fix (tar archive) ~21 s one-time extract 14.2 + seed 0.07 + vite cold 6.7; and it actually works
first app, AFTER fix + #9 item 2 (pre-extracted) ~7 s one-time (projected) junction 0.07 + vite cold 6.7; the 14.2 s extract is gone
first app, if we shipped npm instead ~49 s 42.7 + 6.7; the archive saves ~28 s and needs no npm
every subsequent app ~0.8 s seed 0.07 + vite warm 0.7 (near-instant)

#9 item 2 (DONE): the Windows build now ships node_modules ALREADY EXTRACTED in resources (digest-tagged); _ensure_warm_cache junctions a workspace straight at it (_bundled_extracted_modules), so there is no tar-extract on first app -- the 14.2 s Defender-scanned write cost moves to install time, once. Verified by backend/tests/test_bundled_extracted_modules.py (selection + Mac fallback) and the build step build-app-win.ps1 4b now robocopies the tree into resources.

Takeaways: the archive (Bug #2 fix) turns a broken/∞ first-app into a working ~21s one-time, and ~0.8s for every app after. The remaining ~14s extract is the SAME Defender-on-many-small-files cost as cold app-startup (Task #9) -- the one lever that would shrink both.

Net time decreased per step (measured)

step before after saved
backend boot: service lifespan 7412 ms 84 ms -7328 ms (-99%)
backend boot: import + all lifespans floor 8256 ms 857 ms -7399 ms (-90%)
backend-http-ready warm (end-to-end) ~9-10 s ~2-3 s (projected) ~-7 s
App Builder dependency download 42.7 s npm 14.2 s archive -28.5 s (-67%)
App Builder first app -> preview broken/never ~21 s working inf -> 21 s
App Builder subsequent app -> preview n/a ~0.8 s near-instant
skills catalog availability empty until reboot(s) instant (seeded) bug eliminated

#9 packaging approach: shrink the Defender file surface (build-gated)

Defender real-time-scans every small file: python-env = 13,554 files; node_modules = ~tens of thousands; app.asar = 639 MB. It rescans python-env on the first launch after each update (54-138 s cold spikes) and scans node_modules as it is written (the 14.2 s extract). Fix family: fewer/larger files, scan-once-at-install instead of per-launch / per-first-app. Each item is independent, reversible, and must be validated on a real packaged EXE (Task #10).

  1. [DRAFTED, build-gated] Zip the Python stdlib -> python313.zip (medium risk). Draft: scripts/zip-python-stdlib.ps1 (dry-run by default; NOT wired into the release build yet). Measured on the real env: 910 stdlib .py/.pyc files (15.1 MB) collapse into one zip. CPython auto-adds /python313.zip to sys.path, so no python._pth is needed; site-packages + DLLs (native .pyd) stay loose; a keep-list keeps data-file stdlib dirs (lib2to3, idlelib, tkinter, ...) loose. Impact: ~7% of total python-env file count, but it collapses the stdlib import-time file-opens (the cold-launch Defender scan storm) into a single scanned file; bigger combined with #3. Validation (Task #10): -Apply on a copy, then import backend.main, importtime parity, boot the packaged backend, measure cold backend-http-ready vs baseline. Wire into build-app-win.ps1 behind an off-by-default -ZipStdlib switch only after it passes.
  2. [DONE] Ship webapp_template node_modules PRE-EXTRACTED in resources + junction to it (kills the 14.2 s extract -> ~0 s). build-app-win.ps1 step 4b robocopies the tree into resources; runtime _bundled_extracted_modules()/_ensure_warm_cache() prefer it; tests in test_bundled_extracted_modules.py. Mac still ships the .tar.gz (unchanged).
  3. Precompile + ship only .pyc (drop .py) for app + pure-python deps. Halves remaining loose-file count; low risk; stacks with #1.
  4. Inventory + trim app.asar (639 MB): source maps, dev-only deps, duplicate bundles. Single file (not a count issue) but shrinks cold-read I/O.
  5. Opt-in Defender exclusion for install/data dirs, documented, never silent (needs admin/UAC; security-sensitive). Settings toggle only; do not auto-apply.

Recommended order: #2 (biggest UX win, lowest risk), then #1 (largest cold win, careful import testing), then #3/#4. Validation: re-run profile_startup.sh + a fresh-extract timing on the packaged EXE after each change, diff vs baseline_startup.csv.

Bug fixes (this branch)

  • Bug #1 skills: seed from bundled snapshot + disk cache + retry-until-success. Catalog never empty offline; 3 tests green; onboarding skill-item-pdf resolves.
  • Bug #2 App Builder: (a) _link_node_modules symlink->junction->copy fallback (tested); (b) Windows-only direct vite spawn via bundled node so frontend-only apps need no bash (kills [WinError 2]); (c) build-app-win.ps1 now pre-builds the node_modules archive natively. Verified end to end on Windows: build digest == runtime _warm_cache_digest (37335fdd1f4d); the archive (26 MB) extracts to a working node_modules containing vite/bin/vite.js and the Windows-native @esbuild/win32-x64/esbuild.exe.