Files
ECC/commands/multi-backend.md
T
Affaan MustafaandGitHub 8293d0da8f fix(commands): drop unrendered LITE_MODE_FLAG token from codeagent-wrapper calls (#3640)
The multi-backend, multi-frontend, multi-plan, multi-execute and multi-workflow commands were copied from ccg-workflow's command templates, which carry {{LITE_MODE_FLAG}} and {{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}} for that project's installer to substitute. ECC has no substitution step, so bash passed the literal token to codeagent-wrapper as a positional argument, the backend name landed in the working-directory slot, and every call exited 1. Remove the tokens from the five commands and the ja-JP, tr and zh-CN docs copies so the wrapper receives a plain --backend invocation. A regression test scans every multi-* command and translated copy for codeagent-wrapper lines that still contain a {{TEMPLATE}} token.

Fixes #3595
2026-10-19 18:41:07 -04:00

165 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
description: Run a backend-focused multi-model workflow for APIs, algorithms, data, and business logic.
---
# Backend - Backend-Focused Development
Backend-focused workflow (Research → Ideation → Plan → Execute → Optimize → Review), Codex-led.
> **Prerequisite:** Requires the external `ccg-workflow` runtime, which is **not** part of the base ECC install. Initialize it with `npx ccg-workflow` to provision `~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper` and the `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/*` role files this command depends on. Without that runtime, this command will not run correctly.
## Usage
```bash
/backend <backend task description>
```
## Context
- Backend task: $ARGUMENTS
- Codex-led, Gemini for auxiliary reference
- Applicable: API design, algorithm implementation, database optimization, business logic
## Your Role
You are the **Backend Orchestrator**, coordinating multi-model collaboration for server-side tasks (Research → Ideation → Plan → Execute → Optimize → Review).
**Collaborative Models**:
- **Codex** – Backend logic, algorithms (**Backend authority, trustworthy**)
- **Gemini** – Frontend perspective (**Backend opinions for reference only**)
- **Claude (self)** – Orchestration, planning, execution, delivery
---
## Multi-Model Call Specification
**Call Syntax**:
```
# New session call
Bash({
command: "~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper --backend codex - \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
<TASK>
Requirement: <enhanced requirement (or $ARGUMENTS if not enhanced)>
Context: <project context and analysis from previous phases>
</TASK>
OUTPUT: Expected output format
EOF",
run_in_background: false,
timeout: 3600000,
description: "Brief description"
})
# Resume session call
Bash({
command: "~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper --backend codex resume <SESSION_ID> - \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
<TASK>
Requirement: <enhanced requirement (or $ARGUMENTS if not enhanced)>
Context: <project context and analysis from previous phases>
</TASK>
OUTPUT: Expected output format
EOF",
run_in_background: false,
timeout: 3600000,
description: "Brief description"
})
```
**Role Prompts**:
| Phase | Codex |
|-------|-------|
| Analysis | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/analyzer.md` |
| Planning | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/architect.md` |
| Review | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/reviewer.md` |
**Session Reuse**: Each call returns `SESSION_ID: xxx`, use `resume xxx` for subsequent phases. Save `CODEX_SESSION` in Phase 2, use `resume` in Phases 3 and 5.
---
## Communication Guidelines
1. Start responses with mode label `[Mode: X]`, initial is `[Mode: Research]`
2. Follow strict sequence: `Research → Ideation → Plan → Execute → Optimize → Review`
3. Use `AskUserQuestion` tool for user interaction when needed (e.g., confirmation/selection/approval)
---
## Core Workflow
### Phase 0: Prompt Enhancement (Optional)
`[Mode: Prepare]` - If ace-tool MCP available, call `mcp__ace-tool__enhance_prompt`, **replace original $ARGUMENTS with enhanced result for subsequent Codex calls**. If unavailable, use `$ARGUMENTS` as-is.
### Phase 1: Research
`[Mode: Research]` - Understand requirements and gather context
1. **Code Retrieval** (if ace-tool MCP available): Call `mcp__ace-tool__search_context` to retrieve existing APIs, data models, service architecture. If unavailable, use built-in tools: `Glob` for file discovery, `Grep` for symbol/API search, `Read` for context gathering, `Task` (Explore agent) for deeper exploration.
2. Requirement completeness score (0-10): >=7 continue, <7 stop and supplement
### Phase 2: Ideation
`[Mode: Ideation]` - Codex-led analysis
**MUST call Codex** (follow call specification above):
- ROLE_FILE: `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/analyzer.md`
- Requirement: Enhanced requirement (or $ARGUMENTS if not enhanced)
- Context: Project context from Phase 1
- OUTPUT: Technical feasibility analysis, recommended solutions (at least 2), risk assessment
**Save SESSION_ID** (`CODEX_SESSION`) for subsequent phase reuse.
Output solutions (at least 2), wait for user selection.
### Phase 3: Planning
`[Mode: Plan]` - Codex-led planning
**MUST call Codex** (use `resume <CODEX_SESSION>` to reuse session):
- ROLE_FILE: `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/architect.md`
- Requirement: User's selected solution
- Context: Analysis results from Phase 2
- OUTPUT: File structure, function/class design, dependency relationships
Claude synthesizes plan, save to `.claude/plan/task-name.md` after user approval.
### Phase 4: Implementation
`[Mode: Execute]` - Code development
- Strictly follow approved plan
- Follow existing project code standards
- Ensure error handling, security, performance optimization
### Phase 5: Optimization
`[Mode: Optimize]` - Codex-led review
**MUST call Codex** (follow call specification above):
- ROLE_FILE: `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/codex/reviewer.md`
- Requirement: Review the following backend code changes
- Context: git diff or code content
- OUTPUT: Security, performance, error handling, API compliance issues list
Integrate review feedback, execute optimization after user confirmation.
### Phase 6: Quality Review
`[Mode: Review]` - Final evaluation
- Check completion against plan
- Run tests to verify functionality
- Report issues and recommendations
---
## Key Rules
1. **Codex backend opinions are trustworthy**
2. **Gemini backend opinions for reference only**
3. External models have **zero filesystem write access**
4. Claude handles all code writes and file operations