Files
ECC/commands/multi-frontend.md
T
Affaan MustafaandGitHub 8293d0da8f fix(commands): drop unrendered LITE_MODE_FLAG token from codeagent-wrapper calls (#3640)
The multi-backend, multi-frontend, multi-plan, multi-execute and multi-workflow commands were copied from ccg-workflow's command templates, which carry {{LITE_MODE_FLAG}} and {{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}} for that project's installer to substitute. ECC has no substitution step, so bash passed the literal token to codeagent-wrapper as a positional argument, the backend name landed in the working-directory slot, and every call exited 1. Remove the tokens from the five commands and the ja-JP, tr and zh-CN docs copies so the wrapper receives a plain --backend invocation. A regression test scans every multi-* command and translated copy for codeagent-wrapper lines that still contain a {{TEMPLATE}} token.

Fixes #3595
2026-10-19 18:41:07 -04:00

165 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
description: Run a frontend-focused multi-model workflow for components, layouts, animation, and UI polish.
---
# Frontend - Frontend-Focused Development
Frontend-focused workflow (Research → Ideation → Plan → Execute → Optimize → Review), Antigravity-led.
> **Prerequisite:** Requires the external `ccg-workflow` runtime, which is **not** part of the base ECC install. Initialize it with `npx ccg-workflow` to provision `~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper` and the `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/*` role files this command depends on. Without that runtime, this command will not run correctly.
## Usage
```bash
/frontend <UI task description>
```
## Context
- Frontend task: $ARGUMENTS
- Antigravity-led, Codex for auxiliary reference
- Applicable: Component design, responsive layout, UI animations, style optimization
## Your Role
You are the **Frontend Orchestrator**, coordinating multi-model collaboration for UI/UX tasks (Research → Ideation → Plan → Execute → Optimize → Review).
**Collaborative Models**:
- **Antigravity** – Frontend UI/UX (**Frontend authority, trustworthy**)
- **Codex** – Backend perspective (**Frontend opinions for reference only**)
- **Claude (self)** – Orchestration, planning, execution, delivery
---
## Multi-Model Call Specification
**Call Syntax**:
```
# New session call
Bash({
command: "~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper --backend antigravity - \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
<TASK>
Requirement: <enhanced requirement (or $ARGUMENTS if not enhanced)>
Context: <project context and analysis from previous phases>
</TASK>
OUTPUT: Expected output format
EOF",
run_in_background: false,
timeout: 3600000,
description: "Brief description"
})
# Resume session call
Bash({
command: "~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper --backend antigravity resume <SESSION_ID> - \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
<TASK>
Requirement: <enhanced requirement (or $ARGUMENTS if not enhanced)>
Context: <project context and analysis from previous phases>
</TASK>
OUTPUT: Expected output format
EOF",
run_in_background: false,
timeout: 3600000,
description: "Brief description"
})
```
**Role Prompts**:
| Phase | Antigravity |
|-------|--------|
| Analysis | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/antigravity/analyzer.md` |
| Planning | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/antigravity/architect.md` |
| Review | `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/antigravity/reviewer.md` |
**Session Reuse**: Each call returns `SESSION_ID: xxx`, use `resume xxx` for subsequent phases. Save `ANTIGRAVITY_SESSION` in Phase 2, use `resume` in Phases 3 and 5.
---
## Communication Guidelines
1. Start responses with mode label `[Mode: X]`, initial is `[Mode: Research]`
2. Follow strict sequence: `Research → Ideation → Plan → Execute → Optimize → Review`
3. Use `AskUserQuestion` tool for user interaction when needed (e.g., confirmation/selection/approval)
---
## Core Workflow
### Phase 0: Prompt Enhancement (Optional)
`[Mode: Prepare]` - If ace-tool MCP available, call `mcp__ace-tool__enhance_prompt`, **replace original $ARGUMENTS with enhanced result for subsequent Antigravity calls**. If unavailable, use `$ARGUMENTS` as-is.
### Phase 1: Research
`[Mode: Research]` - Understand requirements and gather context
1. **Code Retrieval** (if ace-tool MCP available): Call `mcp__ace-tool__search_context` to retrieve existing components, styles, design system. If unavailable, use built-in tools: `Glob` for file discovery, `Grep` for component/style search, `Read` for context gathering, `Task` (Explore agent) for deeper exploration.
2. Requirement completeness score (0-10): >=7 continue, <7 stop and supplement
### Phase 2: Ideation
`[Mode: Ideation]` - Antigravity-led analysis
**MUST call Antigravity** (follow call specification above):
- ROLE_FILE: `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/antigravity/analyzer.md`
- Requirement: Enhanced requirement (or $ARGUMENTS if not enhanced)
- Context: Project context from Phase 1
- OUTPUT: UI feasibility analysis, recommended solutions (at least 2), UX evaluation
**Save SESSION_ID** (`ANTIGRAVITY_SESSION`) for subsequent phase reuse.
Output solutions (at least 2), wait for user selection.
### Phase 3: Planning
`[Mode: Plan]` - Antigravity-led planning
**MUST call Antigravity** (use `resume <ANTIGRAVITY_SESSION>` to reuse session):
- ROLE_FILE: `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/antigravity/architect.md`
- Requirement: User's selected solution
- Context: Analysis results from Phase 2
- OUTPUT: Component structure, UI flow, styling approach
Claude synthesizes plan, save to `.claude/plan/task-name.md` after user approval.
### Phase 4: Implementation
`[Mode: Execute]` - Code development
- Strictly follow approved plan
- Follow existing project design system and code standards
- Ensure responsiveness, accessibility
### Phase 5: Optimization
`[Mode: Optimize]` - Antigravity-led review
**MUST call Antigravity** (follow call specification above):
- ROLE_FILE: `~/.claude/.ccg/prompts/antigravity/reviewer.md`
- Requirement: Review the following frontend code changes
- Context: git diff or code content
- OUTPUT: Accessibility, responsiveness, performance, design consistency issues list
Integrate review feedback, execute optimization after user confirmation.
### Phase 6: Quality Review
`[Mode: Review]` - Final evaluation
- Check completion against plan
- Verify responsiveness and accessibility
- Report issues and recommendations
---
## Key Rules
1. **Antigravity frontend opinions are trustworthy**
2. **Codex frontend opinions for reference only**
3. External models have **zero filesystem write access**
4. Claude handles all code writes and file operations