docs: grammar (#2449)

Co-authored-by: Ian Sullivan <ian@frame.ai>

docs/docs/concepts/high_level.md

@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
 
 LLMs are extremely powerful, particularly when connected to other systems such as a retriever or APIs. This is why many LLM applications use a control flow of steps before and / or after LLM calls. As an example [RAG](https://github.com/langchain-ai/rag-from-scratch) performs retrieval of relevant documents to a question, and passes those documents to an LLM in order to ground the response. Often a control flow of steps before and / or after an LLM is called a "chain." Chains are a popular paradigm for programming with LLMs and offer a high degree of reliability; the same set of steps runs with each chain invocation.
 
-However, we often want LLM systems that can pick their own control flow! This is one definition of an [agent](https://blog.langchain.dev/what-is-an-agent/): an agent is a system that uses an LLM to decide the control flow of an application. Unlike a chain, an agent given an LLM some degree of control over the sequence of steps in the application. Examples of using an LLM to decide the control of an application:
+However, we often want LLM systems that can pick their own control flow! This is one definition of an [agent](https://blog.langchain.dev/what-is-an-agent/): an agent is a system that uses an LLM to decide the control flow of an application. Unlike a chain, an agent gives an LLM some degree of control over the sequence of steps in the application. Examples of using an LLM to decide the control of an application:
 
 - Using an LLM to route between two potential paths
 - Using an LLM to decide which of many tools to call
 - Using an LLM to decide whether the generated answer is sufficient or more work is need
 
-There are many different types of [agent architectures](https://blog.langchain.dev/what-is-a-cognitive-architecture/) to consider, which given an LLM varying levels of control. On one extreme, a router allows an LLM to select a single step from a specified set of options and, on the other extreme, a fully autonomous long-running agent may have complete freedom to select any sequence of steps that it wants for a given problem. 
+There are many different types of [agent architectures](https://blog.langchain.dev/what-is-a-cognitive-architecture/) to consider, which give an LLM varying levels of control. On one extreme, a router allows an LLM to select a single step from a specified set of options and, on the other extreme, a fully autonomous long-running agent may have complete freedom to select any sequence of steps that it wants for a given problem. 
 
 ![Agent Types](img/agent_types.png)