## Summary
- Promotes the private K-channel batched ancestor-walk to a stable
public `get_delta_channel_history` / `aget_delta_channel_history` API on
`BaseCheckpointSaver` (returns `Mapping[str, DeltaChannelHistory]`, a
TypedDict with `writes` always present and `seed` `NotRequired`)
- Removes `DELTA_SENTINEL` / `_DeltaSentinel` entirely — the saver layer
is now delta-agnostic on both write and read paths
- Reworks `DeltaChannel` snapshot cadence from "every Nth superstep" to
"every N updates to this channel," persisted in
`CheckpointMetadata.delta_updates_since_snapshot`
- Adds Postgres optimizations: paged stage-1 with cursor (1024-row
pages) and per-channel UNION ALL stage-2 (no over-fetch when channels
have different chain depths)
- Default `snapshot_frequency` becomes a positive int (default `1000`);
the previous `None` opt-out is removed
## Public API
```python
class DeltaChannelHistory(TypedDict):
writes: list[PendingWrite] # always present, possibly empty
seed: NotRequired[Any] # absent if walk reached root
def get_delta_channel_history(
self, *, config: RunnableConfig, channels: Sequence[str]
) -> Mapping[str, DeltaChannelHistory]: ...
async def aget_delta_channel_history(
self, *, config: RunnableConfig, channels: Sequence[str]
) -> Mapping[str, DeltaChannelHistory]: ...
```
`config` and `channels` are keyword-only so later additions (e.g.
`page_size`) don't shift the positional API.
The TypedDict-with-`NotRequired[seed]` shape matches the existing
checkpoint-package convention (`CheckpointMetadata` is
`TypedDict(total=False)`) — absence-via-key-omission rather than
introducing a new sentinel. Pregel translates `"seed" not in hist` to
`MISSING` on its side at consume time.
The default impl walks `get_tuple` + `parent_config` correctly but is
slow on long chains; savers that care override (`InMemorySaver`,
`PostgresSaver`).
## Sentinel removal
`DELTA_SENTINEL` and `_DeltaSentinel` are deleted entirely. The saver
layer becomes delta-agnostic:
- `DeltaChannel.checkpoint()` returns `MISSING` for non-snapshot steps;
pregel's `create_checkpoint` skips MISSING so delta channels without a
snapshot simply don't appear in `channel_values`
- `InMemorySaver.put` and Postgres `put` no longer filter sentinels
(they have nothing to filter)
- `_needs_replay` becomes `stored is MISSING`
- `DeltaChannel.from_checkpoint` accepts: `MISSING` → empty,
`_DeltaSnapshot(value)` → snapshot value, plain value → pre-migration
legacy
## Snapshot cadence
`DeltaChannel.snapshot_frequency: int` (default `1000`, positive). The
previous `None` opt-out is gone.
```python
def should_snapshot(ch_name, ch):
if force_delta_snapshot: # durability="exit"
return True
return updates_since_snapshot.get(ch_name, 0) >= ch.snapshot_frequency
```
Per-channel update counters are persisted in
`CheckpointMetadata.delta_updates_since_snapshot` (`NotRequired`,
`total=False`). The counter is incremented by `_put_checkpoint` for any
delta channel in `updated_channels` and reset to `0` by
`create_checkpoint` for channels that fire a snapshot this step.
Version-format-independent — works for `int`, `float`, and `str`
versioning schemes alike.
## Postgres optimization
Two improvements internal to the override:
**Stage-1 paged with cursor** (`LIMIT 1024` internal const, `AND
checkpoint_id < ?` for subsequent pages). The previous unpaged form
scanned every checkpoint in `(thread_id, ns)` and was pathological at
high thread depths.
**Stage-2 per-channel UNION ALL**: one `WHERE channel='X' AND
checkpoint_id = ANY(chain_X)` branch per channel plus one seed-blob
branch per channel with a seed. The previous form filtered by `channel =
ANY(channels) AND checkpoint_id = ANY(union_chain_cids)`, over-fetching
writes when channels had different chain depths (`K ×
max(chain_lengths)` vs the correct `sum(chain_lengths)`).
Both improvements stay internal to `PostgresSaver`/`AsyncPostgresSaver`;
the public contract returns a single `Mapping`.
## Benchmarks
`libs/langgraph/tests/test_delta_channel_benchmark.py`. Run via `python
libs/langgraph/tests/test_delta_channel_benchmark.py`. Postgres against
local pg:5441.
Results below trimmed to the high-signal cells. Sub-millisecond /
sub-100-turn rows omitted as warmup-bound; freq=1 omitted (chain depth =
1, nothing to optimize); peak read-time memory and Postgres storage are
flat between branches and omitted. Deep-thread reads and the
cadence-rework storage win are the load-bearing numbers.
### Postgres reads, 500 turns
| Scenario | main | branch | Δ |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| Single-channel deep read | 17.7 ms | **6.1 ms** | **-66%** |
| Single-channel, 1000 turns | 35.0 ms | **14.3 ms** | **-59%** |
| K=3 channels, freq=50 uniform | 70.5 ms | **41.4 ms** | **-41%** |
| K=8 channels, freq=50 uniform | 214.2 ms | **139.4 ms** | **-35%** |
| K=8 channels, mixed freq (25/50/100/.../1000) | 295.6 ms | **214.4
ms** | **-27%** |
K-channel batching + paged stage-1 + per-channel UNION ALL stage-2 doing
exactly what they should at depth.
### InMemory reads, 500 turns
| Scenario | main | branch | Δ |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| Single-channel deep read | 7.9 ms | **3.8 ms** | **-52%** |
| Single-channel, 1000 turns | 15.6 ms | **7.2 ms** | **-54%** |
| K=8 channels, freq=50 uniform | 112.3 ms | 94.6 ms | -16% |
| K=8 channels, mixed freq | 184.9 ms | **134.5 ms** | **-27%** |
### InMemory storage, 500 turns (cadence-rework win)
| Scenario | main | branch | Δ |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| K=3, freq=50 uniform | 8.7 MB | **3.3 MB** | **-62%** |
| K=3 mixed freq | 3.8 MB | **1.3 MB** | **-66%** |
| K=8, freq=50 uniform | 23.1 MB | **8.7 MB** | **-62%** |
| K=8 mixed freq | 11.5 MB | **4.2 MB** | **-64%** |
Snapshot frequency now counts **channel updates** instead of
**supersteps**. On graphs where supersteps outpace per-channel updates
(e.g., input/end steps that don't write to channels), branch stores ~3×
fewer snapshot blobs.
### Tradeoff worth flagging
InMemory K=3 with mixed frequencies (50/200/1000) at 500 turns: **+64%
read latency** (46.6 → 76.5 ms). The mixed scenario has a channel with
`freq=1000` that goes the entire 500-turn run with no snapshot. On main,
the old superstep-counted cadence happened to fire at step=500 anyway.
New cadence gives users explicit control over walk depth via
`snapshot_frequency`. The K=8 mixed case still wins overall (-27%); this
regression is specific to the K=3 mixed shape.
Default `snapshot_frequency=1000` is the upper bound on walk depth —
it's a tunable knob.
## Tests
- New sqlite smoke test (`test_get_delta_channel_history.py`) exercises
the inherited default `BaseCheckpointSaver` impl via `SqliteSaver` /
`AsyncSqliteSaver` end-to-end with a real `DeltaChannel`-backed graph.
Sqlite uses the default unchanged — this validates the default path
actually works on a real second saver, not just on the optimized
override.
- Module-level `pytest.importorskip("langgraph.channels.delta")` guards
the test for sqlite's standalone CI environment (matches the postgres
pattern).
## Test plan
- [x] `libs/checkpoint`: 150 passed, 16 skipped
- [x] `libs/langgraph` (channels + delta migration): 41/41 (post-merge)
- [x] `libs/langgraph` (full pregel suite): 1784 passing — 6 "failures"
verified via `env -i` clean shell are local LangSmith env vars + `git
describe revision_id` polluting LangChain metadata fixtures; CI is
unaffected
- [x] `libs/checkpoint-postgres`: 40/40 saver tests + 3/3 delta channel
reconstruction tests against local Postgres
- [x] `libs/checkpoint-sqlite`: 105/105 (incl. retry-passed flake
`test_ttl_refresh`, unrelated to this PR)
- [x] Lint clean across all four libs (`ruff format`, `ruff check`,
`mypy`)
- [x] Branch-vs-main benchmarks — see results above
---------
Co-authored-by: Quanzheng Long <long@langchain.dev>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Low-level orchestration framework for building stateful agents.
Trusted by companies shaping the future of agents – including Klarna, Replit, Elastic, and more – LangGraph is a low-level orchestration framework for building, managing, and deploying long-running, stateful agents.
pip install -U langgraph
If you're looking to quickly build agents with LangChain's create_agent (built on LangGraph), check out the LangChain Agents documentation.
Note
Looking for the JS/TS library? Check out LangGraph.js and the JS docs.
Why use LangGraph?
LangGraph provides low-level supporting infrastructure for any long-running, stateful workflow or agent:
- Durable execution — Build agents that persist through failures and can run for extended periods, automatically resuming from exactly where they left off.
- Human-in-the-loop — Seamlessly incorporate human oversight by inspecting and modifying agent state at any point during execution.
- Comprehensive memory — Create truly stateful agents with both short-term working memory for ongoing reasoning and long-term persistent memory across sessions.
- Debugging with LangSmith — Gain deep visibility into complex agent behavior with visualization tools that trace execution paths, capture state transitions, and provide detailed runtime metrics.
- Production-ready deployment — Deploy sophisticated agent systems confidently with scalable infrastructure designed to handle the unique challenges of stateful, long-running workflows.
Tip
For developing, debugging, and deploying AI agents and LLM applications, see LangSmith.
LangGraph ecosystem
While LangGraph can be used standalone, it also integrates seamlessly with any LangChain product, giving developers a full suite of tools for building agents.
To improve your LLM application development, pair LangGraph with:
- Deep Agents (new!) – Build agents that can plan, use subagents, and leverage file systems for complex tasks.
- LangChain – Provides integrations and composable components to streamline LLM application development.
- LangSmith – Helpful for agent evals and observability. Debug poor-performing LLM app runs, evaluate agent trajectories, gain visibility in production, and improve performance over time.
- LangSmith Deployment – Deploy and scale agents effortlessly with a purpose-built deployment platform for long-running, stateful workflows. Discover, reuse, configure, and share agents across teams – and iterate quickly with visual prototyping in LangSmith Studio.
Documentation
- docs.langchain.com – Comprehensive documentation, including conceptual overviews and guides
- reference.langchain.com/python/langgraph – API reference docs for LangGraph packages
- LangGraph Quickstart – Get started building with LangGraph
- Chat LangChain – Chat with the LangChain documentation and get answers to your questions
Discussions: Visit the LangChain Forum to connect with the community and share all of your technical questions, ideas, and feedback.
Additional resources
- Guides – Quick, actionable code snippets for topics such as streaming, adding memory & persistence, and design patterns (e.g. branching, subgraphs, etc.).
- LangChain Academy – Learn the basics of LangGraph in our free, structured course.
- Case studies – Hear how industry leaders use LangGraph to ship AI applications at scale.
- Contributing Guide – Learn how to contribute to LangChain projects and find good first issues.
- Code of Conduct – Our community guidelines and standards for participation.
Acknowledgements
LangGraph is inspired by Pregel and Apache Beam. The public interface draws inspiration from NetworkX. LangGraph is built by LangChain Inc, the creators of LangChain, but can be used without LangChain.