**Problem.** `interrupt(response_schema=...)` checks a human's answer when the graph resumes. If the answer doesn't match the schema, the resume fails, nothing is saved, and the human can answer again (#8886). That works when the interrupt runs in a graph node, but not when it runs inside a tool: either the tool calls `interrupt()` itself, or it starts a graph that does, such as a subagent called as a tool. There, the resume returns normally and the interrupt disappears. **Why.** `interrupt()` raises a `pydantic.ValidationError` for an invalid answer. When one comes out of a tool, `ToolNode` assumes the model passed bad arguments, so it hands the error to the model ("Error invoking tool … Please fix the error and try again") and the run carries on. The human never sees the error, the model is blamed for it, and the interrupt is no longer pending. **Fix.** `interrupt()` still raises the same `ValidationError`, but marks it so a new helper, `langgraph.errors.is_invalid_resume(error)`, can recognize it. `ToolNode` re-raises these errors instead of handing them to the model, whatever `handle_tool_errors` is set to, so a bad answer fails the resume the same way inside a tool as outside one: nothing is saved and the interrupt can be answered again. Every other `ValidationError` from a tool is handled as before. **Also fixed, in the same error handling.** With `wrap_tool_call` set and a `handle_tool_errors` other than the default (for example `True`), `ToolNode` turned any exception from the wrapper into an error `ToolMessage`, including `GraphInterrupt`. So an interrupt in that setup never paused: the model got `Error: GraphInterrupt(...)` instead. Interrupts now propagate there too, as they already do without a wrapper. `create_agent` uses the default handler, so it was not affected. **Compatibility.** Not a breaking change: the error type is unchanged. Worth a careful look: a wrapped `ToolNode` with a non-default `handle_tool_errors` now pauses on interrupts instead of returning them to the model as errors. With an older `langgraph` that doesn't have `is_invalid_resume`, `ToolNode` keeps today's behavior.
Low-level orchestration framework for building stateful agents.
Trusted by companies shaping the future of agents – including Klarna, Replit, Elastic, and more – LangGraph is a low-level orchestration framework for building, managing, and deploying long-running, stateful agents.
pip install -U langgraph
Tip
If you're looking to quickly build agents, check out Deep Agents — a higher-level package built on LangGraph for agents that can plan, use subagents, and leverage file systems for complex tasks.
For an equivalent JS/TS library, check out LangGraph.js and the JS docs.
Why use LangGraph?
LangGraph provides low-level supporting infrastructure for any long-running, stateful workflow or agent:
- Durable execution — Build agents that persist through failures and can run for extended periods, automatically resuming from exactly where they left off.
- Human-in-the-loop — Seamlessly incorporate human oversight by inspecting and modifying agent state at any point during execution.
- Comprehensive memory — Create truly stateful agents with both short-term working memory for ongoing reasoning and long-term persistent memory across sessions.
- Debugging with LangSmith — Gain deep visibility into complex agent behavior with visualization tools that trace execution paths, capture state transitions, and provide detailed runtime metrics.
- Production-ready deployment — Deploy sophisticated agent systems confidently with scalable infrastructure designed to handle the unique challenges of stateful, long-running workflows.
Tip
For developing, debugging, and deploying AI agents and LLM applications, see LangSmith.
LangGraph ecosystem
While LangGraph can be used standalone, it also integrates seamlessly with any LangChain product, giving developers a full suite of tools for building agents.
To improve your LLM application development, pair LangGraph with:
- Deep Agents – Build agents that can plan, use subagents, and leverage file systems for complex tasks.
- LangChain – Provides integrations and composable components to streamline LLM application development.
- LangSmith – Helpful for agent evals and observability. Debug poor-performing LLM app runs, evaluate agent trajectories, gain visibility in production, and improve performance over time.
- LangSmith Deployment – Deploy and scale agents effortlessly with a purpose-built deployment platform for long-running, stateful workflows. Discover, reuse, configure, and share agents across teams – and iterate quickly with visual prototyping in LangSmith Studio.
Documentation
- docs.langchain.com – Comprehensive documentation, including conceptual overviews and guides
- reference.langchain.com/python/langgraph – API reference docs for LangGraph packages
- LangGraph Quickstart – Get started building with LangGraph
- Chat LangChain – Chat with the LangChain documentation and get answers to your questions
Discussions: Visit the LangChain Forum to connect with the community and share all of your technical questions, ideas, and feedback.
Additional resources
- Guides – Quick, actionable code snippets for topics such as streaming, adding memory & persistence, and design patterns (e.g. branching, subgraphs, etc.).
- LangChain Academy – Learn the basics of LangGraph in our free, structured course.
- Case studies – Hear how industry leaders use LangGraph to ship AI applications at scale.
- Contributing Guide – Learn how to contribute to LangChain projects and find good first issues.
- Code of Conduct – Our community guidelines and standards for participation.
Acknowledgements
LangGraph is inspired by Pregel and Apache Beam. The public interface draws inspiration from NetworkX. LangGraph is built by LangChain Inc, the creators of LangChain, but can be used without LangChain.