Refactor the get_schema call to make more sense.

This commit is contained in:
Mike Auty
2016-07-29 02:56:20 +01:00
parent 4f17143fd3
commit bb2dd859d5
9 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ class DependencyResolver(validity.ValidityRoutines):
deptree = []
for subreq in configurable.get_schema():
for subreq in configurable.get_requirements():
# Find all the different ways to fulfill it (recursively)
# TODO: Ensure no cycles or loops
if not isinstance(subreq, interfaces.configuration.ConstraintInterface):
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ class ConfigurableInterface(validity.ValidityRoutines):
return self._config_path
@classmethod
def get_schema(cls):
def get_requirements(cls):
"""Returns a list of configuration schema nodes for this object"""
return []
+3 -3
View File
@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ class DataLayerInterface(configuration.ProviderInterface, validity.ValidityRouti
pass
@classmethod
def get_schema(cls):
"""Returns a list of requirements for this type of layer"""
def get_requirements(cls):
"""Returns a list of Requirement objects for this type of layer"""
return []
@classmethod
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ class DataLayerInterface(configuration.ProviderInterface, validity.ValidityRouti
# Construct the layer
requirement_dict = {}
for req in cls.get_schema():
for req in cls.get_requirements():
if req.name in node_config.data:
requirement_dict[req.name] = node_config.data[req.name]
# Fulfillment must happen, exceptions happening here mean the requirements aren't correct
+2 -2
View File
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ class PluginInterface(configuration_interface.ConfigurableInterface, validity.Va
return self._context
@classmethod
def get_schema(cls):
"""Returns a list of configuration schema items"""
def get_requirements(cls):
"""Returns a list of Requirement objects for this plugin"""
return []
def validate_inputs(self):
+1 -1
View File
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ class Intel(interfaces.layers.TranslationLayerInterface):
return [self._base_layer]
@classmethod
def get_schema(cls):
def get_requirements(cls):
return [volatility.framework.configuration.requirements.TranslationLayerRequirement(name = 'memory_layer',
constraints = {
"type": "physical"},
+1 -1
View File
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ class LimeLayer(interfaces.layers.TranslationLayerInterface):
return [self._base_layer]
@classmethod
def get_schema(cls):
def get_requirements(cls):
return [requirements.TranslationLayerRequirement(name = 'base_layer',
constraints = {"type": "physical"},
optional = False)]
+2 -2
View File
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ class BufferDataLayer(interfaces.layers.DataLayerInterface):
self._buffer = self._buffer[:address] + data + self._buffer[address + len(data):]
@classmethod
def get_schema(cls):
def get_requirements(cls):
# No real requirements (only the buffer). Need to figure out if there's a better way of representing this
return [requirements.BytesRequirement(name = 'buffer', description = "The direct bytes to interact with",
optional = False)]
@@ -127,5 +127,5 @@ class FileLayer(interfaces.layers.DataLayerInterface):
self._file.close()
@classmethod
def get_schema(cls):
def get_requirements(cls):
return [requirements.StringRequirement(name = 'filename', optional = False)]
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ class XPSP2WindowsKernelSymbolProvider(WindowsKernelSymbolProvider):
space_name = 'ntkrnlmp'
@classmethod
def get_schema(cls):
def get_requirements(cls):
return [requirements.NativeSymbolRequirement("natives", description = "Native Symbols for x86",
constraints = {"type": "natives",
"architecture": "ia32"})]
+1 -1
View File
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ from volatility.framework.renderers import TreeGrid
class PsList(plugins.PluginInterface):
@classmethod
def get_schema(cls):
def get_requirements(cls):
return [requirements.TranslationLayerRequirement(name = 'primary',
description = 'Kernel Address Space',
constraints = {"type": "memory",